Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
PSYCHO-SOMATIC STORY OF A KURDISH GIRL'S EYE BALL
#1
THE STORY OF THE KURDISH LITTLE GIRL WHICH HAS SENT TO HER FATHER BY KEMALISTS IS BELOW:

Summary:

The officially terror makers of a state like the Milosevic’s Yugoslavia or the Saddam’s Iraq, briefly of one of the Second Soviet type gang-states one may find easily around the East Mediterranean Region and in the Middle-East , gauged out one eye of the little daughter of a ethnic villager after its agents had abducted that innocent girl child. One day a sort of postman has carried to the villager the anatomized organ of his daughter in a blood stained, dirty, little package. The father of the very young, nearly sibling victim has recognized at once the gauged out eye of his child. After that very time, he began to look for a certain institution run by East or West Europeans which could investigate honestly and technically whether the eye ball was operated after his daughter had been killed or not. If not, then the little creature might be alive and under some terrible torture. If she would be living he should die! He spent the whole money with which he had planned to feed his farm animals and family members for a good whole winter, and at last managed to get a reliable forensic report showing scientifically that the seeing organ of his daughter was uninstalled from her lovely face after she had been slaughtered. The Kurdish villager enjoyed at this news so much that went mad crying: “The State Lottery smiled to me, I’m the richest and the luckiest man of all lotteries. My daughter’s dead!”
Reply

#2
BIS.....BIS.....BIS.....BIS....BIS!

Post-Operative Commentary of the Speech Therapy Agent:

Deciphering the tremendous cry of the officially slaughtered little girl’s DAD if there were no scientific consciousness with an expert who can make commentaries about the aftermaths of an operation, if at the speaking of all informational process between the operated-the client, and the expert himself lay only a wildly information sharing which zigzagging with obscurity may produce something that is successful and something that is slightly significant, what then would speech therapy be but irrational approach? If such were the case, if there were no rational way which united the client and the therapy agent, if one consideration arose after another like the peaceful armored carriers of the USA in the desert attacking dictators and trying to build up global democracy, if the one thought replaced the other like the numerals of a process in algebra, if the post-operational therapy agents passed through the words as the moss goes through the rivulets, like the arrow piercing nowhere through the wrong targets, a “thoughtless and fruitless activity”, if an method lacked performance was always chasing for its aimless result and there was no science strong enough to tear it from its absurdity, “how empty then and comfortless” social or medical post-operational process related social and medical work it would be! But therefore it is not thus, but as Global Democracy taught the client and his family, so too it fashioned the expert and the father or the child. The dead girl cannot do what that other does, she can only lie in her grave, be loved and missed. Yet she too is very dear and so much helpful, and not less so, for the therapy agent is as it were his better service, with which he is in his own discipline, rejoicing in the fact that this after all is not for himself, that his study can be solution. “He is the genius of recollection, can do nothing except call to mind what has been done, do nothing but admire what has been done; he contributes nothing of his own, but is jealous of the entrusted treasure”-THE CASE OF DEAD GIRL. He follows the option of his post-operational study, but when he has found what he sought, he writes down the reports of SPEECH THERAPY in the case of THE FATHER, that all may read the storied report as he does, be proud of the Europeans’ contribution as he is. This is his achievement, his humble work; this is his scientific service in the room of the speech therapy. If he thus remains true to his method, he strives day and night against the peril of oblivion which would trick humanity out of its HUMAN RIGHTS LEGENDARY, then he has completed his work, then he is gathered to the proto-type of successful expert, who has guided him just as scientifically, for the post-operative therapy is as it were the therapy agent’s better nature, powerless it may be as any method is, but also transfigured as a discipline is. “Hence no one shall be forgotten who was great, and though time tarries long, though a cloud of misunderstanding takes the hero away, his lover comes nevertheless, and the longer the time that has passed, the more faithfully will he cling to him.”
Yet, not anything shall be forgotten which was great or base in the world. But each was great or base in its own way, and each in proportion to the greatness or baseness of that which loved or disdained. For he who understands himself become well known by himself. And he who understood other men became by his faultless potentiality omnipotent to some extent, but he who deciphered the story of a social or medical case from the point of Post-Operational Phase behaved scholarly than all. Everyone shall be remembered, but each became memoir worthy in proportion to his expectation and the destination spoiled by the authorities. One became reasonable within his hopes by expecting the possible, another by expecting the best, but he who expected the impossible as the villager would wish his daughter to be dead for he should live became most irrational than all. Every case shall be remembered, but each was worth of deciphering in proportion to the greatness of that with which it represent like a high potential adventure. For he who strove with the gang state became great by overcoming the malice, and he who strove with deciphering the story became great by overcoming his ignorance, but he who strove with irrational became greater than all. So there was only “deciphering” in the world, man against man, one against a thousand, but he who deciphered the “irrational” cases was greater than all. So there was only hardness worth to be understood upon earth: there was some which overcame all by one’s power, and there was another which could be overcome by the expert’s potency. “There was one who relied upon himself and gained all, there was one who secure in his strength deciphers all, but he who believed in the scholar’s hard work was greater than all”. “There was one who was great by reason of his power, and one who was great by reason of his wisdom, and one who was great by reason of his hope, and one who was great by reason of his love of science and art; but the expert of this CASE would be greater than all, great by reason of his power whose strength is impotence along with hard work, great by reason of his wisdom whose base is energy, great by reason of his hope whose form is scholarship, great by reason of the love which is hatred of one’s own prejudice.
Reply





Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.