By that regulate to Religions and their Churches.

[Mario De Sandozequi]

By that regulate to Religions and their Churches.

While this depends on whether it is believer or not, is an act of faith what each who want believe or not, and it is your individual freedom to decide, this is not this to discussion.

Another house is a public institution that adheres to a religion for auto elected its representative moral and legal. Whatever the religion in question.

Many other public institutions must not mislead the citizen or user and if they are proof that, they have done, these deserve the punishment stipulated in the laws.

Any institution ecclesiastical publishes, should be required to prove and check their peculiar and almost always unfortunate assertions, prior to disseminate as truths.

This is also the duty of all secular state and should avoid being fooled with fallacies to citizens

Every democratic Government and free and every University or Institute of research and science is obliged to discover the truth for the society that houses.

However, they do not do out of fear or perhaps until accomplices of the great deception?

Today there are multiple investigations and to documentaries, which have demonstrated again and again tricks present in religions around the world.

However, these religions serve very well for maintain under control and dominated much of the population deceived without being noticed.

Nobody can prove the existence of a God, and less than their words or miracles, saints, angels, devils, or the purgatory that after 1900 years, say the religious "that whenever There Is Not exist".

As well as in the past anyone could sell the "tonic of youth" without anyone to say anything, or pass quality testing or labeled with the calories contained, etc.

It should be regulated to religions not to say lies pious in their documents and concepts, without having tested before in any laboratory of the world.

Today the religions of the west are "light’s" and since the 60´s and 70'S many young people are not the continued at the foot of the letter. Only view the TV. And that is TV, an ally of capitalism and its instruments of state as the Catholic Church.

Where this for example, this apology published for the Earth was not the center, where the apology by burning in the bonfire to thousands of innocent women by accuse of witchcraft, where this in the Iglesias and Religions the eleven dimensions of our Universe of the Theory "M" or "ropes and super Gravity" and thus more than 1,000 examples?

If, religions and their representatives self should be regulated in any democratic and not to allow him to deceive citizens of goodwill.

[Big_Becka]

Today the religions of the west are "light’s" and since the 60´s and 70'S many young people are not the continued at the foot of the letter. Only view the TV. And that is TV, an ally of capitalism and its instruments of state as the Catholic Church.

I disagree. ;-) Religion was always less popular than the government will have you believe. Paganism and superstition always survived to some extent in rural areas. My exprience is that the kind of people who watch a lot of TV are mildly religious (although they often sin like crazy! :haha ) While people who are open to new ideas will read books and/or socialise with a variety of people. Certainly in the 60s and 70s, TVs were still fairly expensive, so students, hippies, people living in communes, etc would have not had a TV.

I think education and increased travel are the cause for the decline in religion. In the late 19th and early 20th Century, people began to read new ideas:
- the study of mythology (especially Egyptology) was very fashionable. Paganism was reinvented, and Satanism created.
- Socialism became popular, along with the idea that religion is an instrument of the ruling classes (which is often true in protestant countries).
- Penguin started printing paperback books - until then, books had been a luxury item, and most households only had one book (usually the Bible or a prayer book).
- State-funded education lead to more people from lower class backgrounds having the opportunity to go to University. This exposed them to more ideas and lifestyles.

The latter two points are important because there had always been some intellectual atheists - most people had just never heard of them.

Every democratic Government and free and every University or Institute of research and science is obliged to discover the truth for the society that houses.

In Texas (USA) schools actually teach that God created the earth in seven days: evolution and the Big Bang are not even discussed. :nonnon

I agree that religion must be monitored. Even though schools are supposed to be multi-cultural, I remember having Christian beliefs rammed down my throat at primary school :evil Even today, you will hear politicians bringing God into politics on the basis that we have "a Christian society" (Or, in the case of other countries, a Muslim or Hindu society).

[Terry]

I think the child's parents should decide on whether of the schools their child should learn. If the parents want the child to go into exact objects it's their choice, the same is with the religious part.