chena wrote:Could you be more careful with what you are saying? 1993 was not long ago to forget things. The war was started by a Georgian "generals" Kitovani and Ioseliani. Ioseliani is dead, Kitovani got a “shelter” in Russia (tell me why?).
The president which said "georgia for georgians" - zviad gamsakhurdia was not president anymore (because most of the country did not like his policies, however there are still his supporters). Also, very interesting thing is that father of Zviad Gamsakhurdia was KGB agent, also Zviad Gamsakhurdia himself was released from the prison (he was arresting as a "disident") after his public "confession" against his friends. Further in 1990s Georgian dissidents (most influential and smart ones, i.e. Kostava, Chavchavadze, Chanturia...) have died or been killed. For some reason Zviad was the only one who "survived". Again tell me why?
Abkhazians even with help of Chechens would not been able to "win" the war without significant "help" from Russia. There are tapes where Russians and Chechens were playing football with a head of killed Georgian.
I totally agree that genocide is unacceptable; I do not think that killing civilians is something honorable either for Georgians or for Russians. But (correct me if I am wrong) it seems that 300 000 IDPs and tens of thousands Georgians killed in Abkhazia and South Ossetia are not impressive enough to call that genocide and to raise your voice against that.
I'm careful enough. I'm glad you admit that war was started by the Georgians. I don't (and can't) know why Ioseliani is dead, and why Kitovani got a shelter in Russia, but I understand, what you're hinting at

That they were Moscow agents, and that it's Moscow again who started and spoiled the whole thing. I also know, that this exactly "truth" will be in your new history books (like in the Ukraine). Funny thing about you accusing Gamasakhurdia, a Georgian nationalist, of being a Kremlin agent

About his father. After the fall of the Nazi Germany, Americans were trying to find some decent non-SS Germans among high officers, but failed. Because they found out that all of them were SS

. Same in the USSR - all "active" people were either in the Party, or in KGB

I'm old enough (43) to remember the collapse of the USSR and what happened after. The USSR was ruined by the communist party leaders, because they were partly stupid, partly too greedy, and not satisfied with what they had. The falldown was also the result of the longtime destructive activities, carried out by the US. When the so-called perestroika began, nobody could stop the process, and we immediately had 15 presidents instead of 1, and the staff of the 15 presidents. More and more people at power. Communists immediately became anticommunists, don't you remember it? There was a great chance to divide power, to get as much as possible. Do you think that happened all under Moscow control? It was out of any control very soon, because the republics became de facto independent 3-4 years after 1985. Nationalistic moods grew everywhere, and somebody set them on fire. I'm sure these could not be and Russian or Pro-Russian forces, because these did not exist as such. The last Russian forces were killed and expatriated in the 1920's. What we had in 1980's - was a Soviet state-and-party machine, Soviet Army, etc. And the leaders didn't give a f*uck about Russia. Those were attempts to stay in power, to keep what they had. That was agony. More or less pro-Russian leaders are Putin & Medvedev, plus they are smart. Gorbachev & Schevardnadze were stupid. Yeltsin was an idiot like your Saakashvili today, plus a drunkard. By the way, the difference between you and me is that I can admit the fact that Russian president can be an idiot, but you can't admit the same (clearly visible) thing about the Georgian one
I don't deny the Russian support of Abkhazia. Not sure about headball, but, in principle, it's Basayev style headball. Don't ask me, what I'd do in place of "that time" leaders - to support or not to support. I dunno. But I want all the participants of this discussion to allow at least a probability of some "internal" battles for power inside national republics. It's very easy to accuse Moscow of every possible thing. If you namage to prove something - OK, but that was a Soviet apparat sending Soviet internal troops to Tbilisi in 1989, for example. But you seem to have replaced all words "Communist" and "Soviet" by the word "Russian". And so on and so forth. Yeltsin's government was not Russian and pro-Russian either, though the country's name was Russia already.
As to me, I raise my voice against any genocide and any looting
But tell me, seriously, do you really think this "law-enforcing operation" of Saakashvili could be a success? What did he hope for? That he'll kill half og the population and the Russian peacekeepers, the rest will run away and time for referendum? Do you understand, that your problem is not Kokoyty and "his gang" (how many people are in the gang)? The problem is all of the Ossetians, with or without Russian support. Even if Russia goes away, and you capture South Ossetia, killing more than half (because they'll fight), and after you win (nominally) - they'll never forgive you and there'll be revenge. Both officials and civilians would be killed. And no end to the story...
And Russia warned the West - about recognizing Kosovo - it's dangerous!!! By the way, has Georgia recognized Kosovo?

If Kosovo can, why not Abkhazia and SO? Double standards, my friend. This world is not fair.