Malik wrote:What do you think about the following phrase of our President? ‘The speculations whether or not Lukashenko has veered towards the West are stupid and absurd’ – President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko. ( news.belta. by/en/news/president?id=453243 )
I hope now you’ve become convinced that Lukashenko is totally unreliable as a partner. Here in Belarus it’s been long since we realized that he never splits the difference and doesn’t take into account the interests of those he deals with. But you there in Europe have been very naпve to think that you’ll manage to make him accept your conditions which are unfavorable for him. You should realize it at last that he’s a dictator who will never play the game by your rules. Lukashenko will simply take everything he needs from you and then will impudently say that Europe demands too much from him. After that he’ll go back to Russia (which has happened many times already) that will support him so as just to make things lively for Europe. You see, Lukashenko behaves like a dirty road prostitute who has been f*cked by hundreds of different men and who is infected with many diseases. Isn’t it disgusting for you to deal with him?
paul_hip wrote:Huh, Eastern Partnership... I just wonder what the EU might be expecting from this project. If you make a closer inspection you will notice that EaP is just a gathering of flawed sub-countries. Just see for its members. Belarus – the last dictatorship of Europe. Georgia – loony schizo-president Saakashvili known for his pro-Americanism. Ukraine – another pro-American nation and everlasting political squabbles and intrigues among the “orange” power and also everlasting gas transit crisis. Moldova – not even less repulsive president of Voronin who vacated seat in September. A group of curiosities! Why the hell we should be bound with them? The whole thing is neither more nor less than mere waste of EU funds! By the way, EaP was initiated by Sweden so I dare say that Swedish gov is just using the EU budget to achieve some of its own goals. Say, in Belarus it might be privatization of the pipeline industry enterprises. No kidding, because in case of success Sweden would gain a sweet bonus which is considerable increase of Sweden’s influence in Europe having under control one of key routs of energy transit. I only wonder why they in Brussels don’t seem to care. Is it really OK for them?
Well, European integration is intended for just this type of instability. Look what it is doing for the Balkans. Usually in partnership and association agreements with Balkans countries there is an EU led regime of good governance, human rights and democracy. This EU-led regime is often loaded with "sweets," often called conditionality, and playing by the EU's rule of the game usually means visa free travel, aid and trade. 
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests